February 16th, 2011

now let me tell you what *i* think

The Most Beautiful Fraud: The King’s Speech

It’s pretty presumptuous — not to mention trite — for a critic to talk about the movie a filmmaker should have made instead of the one they made.  But it’s also a suggestion that’s inescapable after watching a movie like The King’s Speech.  Here you have a concatenation of massive and fascinating historical events:  the outbreak of the Second World War; the most desperate secession crisis in British history; the tail end of the Great Depression; internal political divisions among the royals and the government; and an unprecedented number of class struggles.  Instead, Tom Hooper and David Seidler have made a movie about…a mild speech impediment suffered by the man who would one day be King George VI.  It’s not the most interesting story in the film; it’s not even the most interesting story in the life of King George VI.  Watching two hours of him attempting to correct a mild stutter with the aid of his quirky Australian speech therapist seems like enough to convince even people who don’t know the real historical events happening in the background that they’ve tuned in to the wrong movie.

The King’s Speech is a trifle, a frothy, delicate little concoction that tempts the emotions and senses while it’s being experienced but leaves absolutely nothing, not even an aftertaste, when it’s finished.  No one is saying that every film has to be grim and gritty, but, presumptuous as it may be for me to say so, I’m convinced that when a story hands you background like the abdication crisis and the Great Slump, and you instead deliver a charming chamber piece about King Bertie and his quirky little family, you have somehow failed as a director.  I am also convinced that if your film has many of the artificial, stagey qualities of a play, even though it was not a play to begin with, your approach to the material is a bit fuzzy.  Helena Bonham Carter’s Duchess of York snacks on bonbons throughout the film, as if to remind us that we are consuming something light and airy with minimal nutritional value.

This all seems to point towards me hating the movie, which I absolutely did not.  Hooper is a skillful director; some of the shots, particularly a snail’s-pace drive through a British industrial fog and the slickly paced delivery of the title speech itself, are lovely to watch.  He also uses some clever camera techniques to both sell the idea of George VI’s isolation and deliver epic-scale filmmaking on an indie-film budget, and that’s not easy to do.  Best of all, its performances are uniformly outstanding, with not a dud in the bunch; you can hate everything else about the movie and it will still come fiercely close to winning you over strictly on the strength of its acting.  Bonham Carter and Geoffrey Rush as Lionel Logue are so consistently great in almost everything they do that it’s easy to just take it as read that they’re going to do well, and they certainly do here; Colin Firth will almost certainly be remembered in perpetuity for his performance as Stammering George, but Guy Pearce is quite magnificent as his brother Poor-Choice-of-Spouse-Making Edward.  Timothy Spall has clearly been waiting a lifetime to play Winston Churchill, and old British pros like Derek Jacobi (as the Archbishop of Canterbury) and Michael Gambon (as George V) finely illustrate how they got to be old British pros.  Movies like this live and die by their acting, and it’s so good here that it keeps the whole thing from collapsing.

That said, the overall thing is lacking; it has no weight, no depth, and no power.  Much talk has been exchanged over its playing fast and loose with the historical facts, but much of it is easy enough to ignore for anyone who wisely hasn’t bothered to immerse themselves in the bogus intricacies of British royal silliness; but a few moments, particularly those involving once and future Prime Ministers and their attitudes towards George and Edward, are egregious enough to rate an eye-roll.  The King’s Speech isn’t exactly calculating — if anything, it’s painfully sincere — but it contains so many elements designed to appeal to movie award voters with an affinity for a certain sort of prestige film (royalty, hist0ry-as-pageant, quirky humor, stories about lifelong pals that transcend class boundaries, adorable over-educated children, diseases and/or disorders that aren’t incurable or gross, triumphant and context-free endings, rampant upper lip stiffening) that it might as well have been written by OscarBot 9000.  Tom Hooper has enough talent that it’s worth keeping an eye on what he does next, but the most creditable thing he pulls off here is to assemble a great cast of established actors and get them to deliver a slate full of fine performances.  Without them, he’s got something that should earn shrugs, not awards.

Mirrored from LEONARD PIERCE DOT COM.

noise noise noise

1000 Flavors of Heavy: The Hell You Say

Decide was, for many years, the Old Faithful of Florida death metal.  While other bands would come and go, form and re-form, expand their sound into tech-death or prog-jazz or contract it by way of ‘getting back to the basics’, Glenn Benton and his not-so-merry men could be counted on to release, year after year, a reliable album of blistering guitar mayhem and unhinged spew directed at poor ol’ Jesus Christ. Come 2004, though, a band that was, if nowhere near groundbreaking, at least stopwatch-reliable underwent its first major personnel shakeup.  Brian and Eric Hoffman, whose dual guitar attack had come to define Deicide’s sound, left the band, and Jack Owen and Ralph Santolla stepped in to replace them.  Many fans felt this was a welcome rejuvenation of a group that had begun to stagnate; others thought it was an unwelcome tampering with a formula that needed no such trifling.  I was in the latter camp; 2006′s The Stench of Redemption was no radical departure from the Deicide house style, but I didn’t feel that Owen and Santolla had really gotten comfortable working with Benton, and the result was, while not a disaster by any means, a fairly minor addition to the band’s catalog.  Unfortunately, the disaster hadn’t been avoided, but merely postponed:  the 2008 follow-up, Till Death Do Us Part, was a dreary reckoning of Benton’s failed marriage, with his ex-wife filling the role normally occupied by Christ.  I don’t give a shit about Glenn Benton’s love life, and from the lackluster sound of the album, neither did anyone else in the band.  (To be fair, I don’t give a shit about Glenn Benton’s opinions of Jesus, either, but at least his blasphemous stuff is delivered with genuine emotion and power.  On Till Death he just sounds pissy.)  Happily for those who still consider Deicide an essential part of any death-metal breakfast, To Hell With God is a fine — and long-overdue — return to form.  Glenn is back to hating the religious icons he was born to hate; Kevin Quirion, who I thought was a pretty poor replacement for the now-absent Ralph Santolla, finally sounds like he’s settled in and is ready to deliver; the songwriting is solid if unspectacular, marked by chugging death-metal choruses that are easy to bang along with (see especially the one-two punch of lead-off single “Hang in Agony Until You’re Dead” and “Servant of the Enemy”).  Best of all, it’s short and to the point; it gets in and out, says its piece, and doesn’t overstay its welcome, avoiding one of the uglier new developments in DM.  Deicide is the death metal equivalent of comfort food, and it’s good to see Benton is still capable of serving it up.

bloody ellBONUS: Pioneering Celtic metal outfit Cruachan has been gone so long — their last album appeared five years ago, just as Viking metal was starting to take their ball and run away with it — that they must have gotten nervous their fans had forgotten about them.  That might account for the sound of Blood on the Black Robe, which sounds hastily assembled even though they’ve had half a decade to work on it.  I may not be the ideal audience for this stuff — with a few notable exceptions, I’ve never been a huge fan of metal influenced by the various flavors of folk and/or ‘world’ music — so maybe its fans have a higher tolerance for the martial sameness of the rhythms and the verse-breakdown-rinse-repeat cycle of the songs.  Fan of tin whistle will find a lot to enjoy here, and I honestly don’t mind Keith Fay’s Gaelic snarl; it’s an enjoyable midpoint between clean vocals and the death metal growl.   But the songs are awfully repetitive, and the Irish coloring serves largely to show how deficient the actual metal is.  They’re also terribly padded, and the lyrics aren’t nearly interesting enough to be repeated over and over the way they are.  This album was promised as a return to the band’s early form, and they’ve definitely added some death metal and black metal tint, but it’s mostly just there as coloration.  Which is too bad, since the few tracks, like “Thy Kingdom Come”, where they really commit to it are by far the album’s standouts.

i can read your mindDOUBLE BONUS: Anyone who knows me knows that I like sludgy goopy acidic doom metal.  So when I got wind of Abraham, a scuzzy-looking Swiss five-piece that rose from the ashes of one of the better of the two dozen bands named Kruger, and was told that they deftly blended sludge, stoner rock, psych-metal and post-Isis canoodling, I got an itching in my download finger.  Soon enough, I was listening to An Eye on the Universe, one of the most enjoyable — and most uncategorizable — albums I’ve heard all year.  These guys have hellacious chops, and unlike a lot of slow-and-low instrumental bands (they feature vocals, but they’re not much to write home about), they don’t hide them under an impenetrable cover of drone.  Which isn’t to say that they aren’t capable of building up a tremendous monotone wall of buzz — they do so several times on their Pelagic debut — but that they’re just as capable of spitting out a noisy, clanging, bursting row of epic proportions, like a band that isn’t ashamed to admit that they’re metal.  Abraham sounds like a band that’s been together for ages, tight as hell and irreducibly powerful on tracks like “Hellsinki” and “Herz, Knie, Staub”, but what they’re doing with that tightness is something unique and special, and they force you into some uncomfortable places when listening to songs that are undeniably great, but curiously new.

its all the same to heTRIPLE KITTY BONUS: Yesterday’s DVD releases included the home-theater debut of Wes Orshoski & Gregg Olliver’s epic heavy metal tag-along/biopic Lemmy, which debuted at last year’s South By Southwest Film Festival (amusingly, opposite a similar documentary about Magnetic Fields’ Stephen Merritt).  It’s sparse on any grand pronouncements about the deep meaning of the Motörhead madman’s career or his deep thoughts about rock ‘n’ roll, and thank God for that:  no one’s going to want to see this movie because Lemmy has something profound to say.  They’re going to want to see it because he’s the indestructible living embodiment of a pure strain of rock ‘n’ roll, living proof that an ugly, brain-damaged freak with more chemicals than blood coursing through his veins can live a long and enjoyable life filled with hot girls and great music.  It’s straight-up fun from beginning to end, two hours spent in the company of a man who has lived through vast swaths of what has come to form the basis of our shared popular culture.  He’s just an amazing character to hang around, and if approached in that sense, Lemmy is one of the most successful rock-docs in years.

Mirrored from LEONARD PIERCE DOT COM.