A revisionist historian is not someone who lies about the reasons for going to war, and then, once the war is over, dismisses questions about the veracity of those stated reasons.
A revisionist historian is not someone who repeatedly distorts, exaggerates or muddles the history of a particular nation and its regime.
A revisionist historian is someone who notices that there is difference between the reasons given for a military action before the action took place and the reasons given after.
I swear to Christ, man. The bullshit that comes out of that guy's mouth.